My question is simple, by their trailers, which do you think will be the better movie? I know I will watch both of them but a debate can be risen from just their trailers? Both have their merits, for instance, in the Civil War trailer we can finally see Black Panther in action chasing Bucky Barnes a.k.a. The Winter Soldier in what I can presume as Germany and we all know that Ant-Man and Spider-Man, the two bugs will join the fight between "two good buddies", Captain Rogers and Tony. Here's another thought about the Civil War plot, particularly if you saw the last bit of the trailer where Cap chose Bucky over Tony and claiming that Bucky is his friend, later replied cynically by Iron Man saying that he WAS Cap's friend once, well, are they friends though? Tony and Steve, I mean? We can all see from the first Avengers movie that Tony and Steve are definitely not friends, they might be considered just work colleagues rather than chummy buddies, I can see Tony getting a fight with his science bud, Bruce Banner but with Captain America? I don't think we can put them in the same buddy conundrum but again, they're going with the famous Civil War comic storyline, so who am I to complain? At least we can finally see more than one superhero helping each other in one superhero title movie and I heard that Thor: Ragnarok will feature Hulk in it, I think Marvel have heard the fan's pleading for more than just the titular hero inside their movies.
Now for the Bat and The Man of Steel, I don't have too much quarrel about the trailer but Doomsday looks ridiculous, I was hoping that Doomsday would look menacing like the comics but all we got was just some copycat of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles but I'm predicting that the more Batman, Superman and Wonder Woman hit him, the more bones will appear around his chin and shoulders, that my opinion.
What do you think? Who won? My money is on Batman v Superman, just because it's the very first time we will see Batman and Superman in one screen unlike Civil War.